All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply. We've compiled frequently asked questions about the novel coronavirus at the center of the current pandemic. Each section includes links to trusted health organizations. First things first: The coronaviruses are a family of viruses whose symptoms can range from the common cold to something more serious and potentially lethal, and a new coronavirus is currently spreading across the planet, affecting the daily lives of many.
It causes a disease called COVID, which can lead to death, particularly for the elderly and people with serious chronic medical conditions. There are currently no vaccines or antiviral treatments available. More than countries and territories, including the United States, have confirmed cases of the infection since the initial outbreak, and on March 11, the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic.
What are its symptoms? Additional symptoms may include aches and pains, nasal congestion, runny nose, sore throat, and diarrhea. Severity of the symptoms range from mild to life-threatening—about 1 in 5 people who are infected require hospital care. How do I get tested? They'll also help determine the safest way to receive your test.
Core and Periphery, Two Types That Make the World
More specific guidelines vary from state to state. NBC News has a handy guide here. Also, if you or a loved one are very sick e. How does it spread?
According to current knowledge, though, the coronavirus that causes COVID is mainly spread from person to person through respiratory droplets. How can we prevent it?
Practice social distancing by increasing the space between you and other people. That means staying home as much as you can, especially if you feel sick.
Disinfect frequently touched surfaces like keyboards, doorknobs, and light switches every day. Cover coughs and sneezes with the inside of your elbow or a tissue.
Throw the tissue away immediately and wash your hands.Activists from right and left converge to choose their nominees and celebrate conservatism Republicans and progressivism Democrats.
But this year was different, and not just because Hillary Clinton became the first woman to be nominated for president by a major party. The conventions highlighted a new political faultline: not between left and right, but between open and closed see article. Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, summed up one side of this divide with his usual pithiness.
His anti-trade tirades were echoed by the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party. America is not alone. Across Europe, the politicians with momentum are those who argue that the world is a nasty, threatening place, and that wise nations should build walls to keep it out.
Such arguments have helped elect an ultranationalist government in Hungary and a Polish one that offers a Trumpian mix of xenophobia and disregard for constitutional norms.
Populist, authoritarian European parties of the right or left now enjoy nearly twice as much support as they did inand are in government or in a ruling coalition in nine countries. On July 26th two men claiming allegiance to Islamic State slit the throat of an year-old Catholic priest in a church near Rouen.
It was the latest in a string of terrorist atrocities in France and Germany. The danger is that a rising sense of insecurity will lead to more electoral victories for closed-world types. This is the gravest risk to the free world since communism. Nothing matters more than countering it. Start by remembering what is at stake. The multilateral system of institutions, rules and alliances, led by America, has underpinned global prosperity for seven decades.
It enabled the rebuilding of post-war Europe, saw off the closed world of Soviet communism and, by connecting China to the global economy, brought about the greatest poverty reduction in history. A world of wall-builders would be poorer and more dangerous. If Europe splits into squabbling pieces and America retreats into an isolationist crouch, less benign powers will fill the vacuum. America has sworn to treat an attack on any member of the NATO alliance as an attack on all.
If Mr Trump can blithely dishonour a treaty, why would any ally trust America again? Small wonder Vladimir Putin backs him.Here are our handpicked suggestions for 'read theory answers'. Our editors have chosen several links from manualmeds. Additionally, you can browse 7 more links that might be useful for you.
Answer 10 questions to obtain your starting level. Read Theory adapts to student ability to provide the perfect reading passag All rights reserved. Then answer the questions Download and print our top-quality reading comprehension lessons today. Professionally designed for grades Fill an entire class period by reading a professionally crafted passage and answering multiple choice and short answer questions High quality reading comprehension worksheets for all ages and ability levels.
To answer these questions, Answer the follow Composition B. Reading Comprehension. Featured titles for the readtheory. We suggest starting your further study with these links. Report as not relevant. More featured picks Featured Site rating:. Featured Site rating:. Readtheory Analogies 4 Level 11, X; Practice 4? Show more.
Featured Featured titles for the readtheory. Related selections laxcrossword answers answers at apexvs. New selections login at simplyhired.The initial 20 members of the club — all undergrads—included libertarians, socialists, Democrats, and Republicans; together, they gathered data on every speaker who had come to Brown in The group sorted by professors and non-professors, as well as by interna tional and domestic topics. For Brigham, the disparity was un acceptable.
Where to draw the line with speakers remains an ongoing debate within SPEAK, but everyone in the group opposes inviting blatantly racist or in tentionally offensive fringe speakers, such as Milo Yiannopoulosor members of the extreme left Antifa groups, who often advocate violence. Instead, the group wants policy-oriented individuals firmly within the conservative or libertarian mainstream.
The group published an initial list of suggested conservative speakers, such as Jeb Bush who indeed spoke on campus in AprilSean Spicer, and Arthur Brooks, former head of the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
The goal, Brigham says, is to create a format that allows students to engage with and challenge such speakers rather than simply hear a lecture. He says that many students have said there should be an advocate on stage for the opposing viewpoint. So he developed a class, Democratic Erosions, which launched in the —18 academic year and took a nonpartisan look at how and why democratic systems fail. Twenty universities from across the country participated in the class over the past academic year, using the same syllabus and interacting through shared blog posts.
The schools ranged from fellow Ivies to public institutions like Berkeley to the University of the Philippines. The percentage-point gap between Republicans and Repub-leaning independents vs. Democrats and Dem-leaning independents across 10 political values. The gap was just 15 percentage points in Source: Pew Research Center, The class did a virtual session with students from the University of Memphis during which one Memphis student spoke of the energy and enthusiasm he felt going to a Republican rally.
Each professor surprised students by acknowledging the values of their opposing ideology. Roemer said he believed markets still had an important role to play in social ist society, while Shleifer explained how difficult it is in practice to create well-functioning market societies. Culture wars are great! A country that is truly free. Has citizens who disagree.
There are some issues that can be discussed without rancor, but one cannot: Trump supporters must agree that their president is racist. It is heartbreaking to me that this is not brought up enough; it is the main stumbling block for many.
One Way To Bridge The Political Divide: Read The Book That's Not For You
Those of us who recognize it cannot believe that others cannot. The first woman appointed to the Su preme Court, she brought differing viewpoints together. Out of invited speakers in No wonder Greer was clueless. I wonder: Who invites the speakers? Support the BAM. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram. Illustration: Nate Kitch. Poll after poll tells us that, in the Trump era, Americans are more politically divided than ever.
Brown profs and students are attempting to understand the national rift—and find ways to reclaim middle ground. For political science professor and libertarian John Tomasi, Brown at its best is a place where students are constantly connecting and engaging with new ideas. The PTP has attracted ire on campus for receiving funding from the Charles Koch Foundation, which pours huge sums into conservative causes.
Tomasi counters that PTP donors have no say in its agenda or curriculum. What do you think? See what other readers are saying about this article and add your voice. Related Issue.Liberals and conservatives literally live in different worlds with different dimensions. It is not enough to describe moral foundations merely as taste buds as Haidt does in one of the metaphors he uses to help us understand his theory. And it is not even enough to describe moral foundations as the color receptors of the moral mind, and the tools of the moral imagination and reasoning as I have done thus far in this essay.
To truly understand the root cause of the culture war we need a better metaphor, because, as Haidt says in his book The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom :.
Our life is the creation of our minds, and we do much of that creating with metaphor. We see new things in terms of things we already understand: Life is a journey, an argument is a war, the mind is a rider on an elephant. With the wrong metaphor we are deluded; with no metaphor we are blind.
We have to understand the concept of moral foundations as forming a synergistic system of checks and balances where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. It does not tell the whole story. To get a true understanding, we have to look at the wall itself. We have to understand the net effect of the system as a whole.
The metaphor that has most helped me to understand morality, religion, and the human quest for meaning is Flatlanda charming little book written in by the English novelist and mathematician Edward Abbot.
Flatland is a two-dimensional world whose inhabitants are geometric figures. The protagonist is a square. One day, the square is visited by a sphere from a three-dimensional world called Spaceland.
When a sphere visits Flatland, however, all that is visible to Flatlanders is the part of the sphere that lies in their plane — in other words, a circle. The square is astonished that the circle is able to grow or shrink at will by rising or sinking into the plane of Flatland and even to disappear and reappear in a different place by leaving the plane, and then reentering it. The reason for the political divide is that liberals and conservatives talk past each other as if we were Flatlanders and Spacelanders.
To a conservative, talking with a liberal about moral issues — and politics is morality in action; moral thinking for social doing — is like the Spacelander trying to explain thickness and height and breadth to a Flatlander. As Haidt says in his TED talk :. When the liberal team loses, as it did inand as it almost did inwe comfort ourselves. Laughter We try to explain why half of America voted for the other team.
We think they must be blinded by religion, or by simple stupidity. You can either take the blue pill and stick to your comforting delusions, or you can take the red pill, learn some moral psychology and step outside the moral matrix.
Haidt has shown that conservatives understand liberals better than liberals understand conservatives. Jost, A. Thorisdottir Eds. Page 3.This year, the National Book Awards ceremony comes at a time when the nation has rarely seemed more divided. The bitter presidential campaign exposed a fault line in the United States that will not easily be repaired.
And while there's no one simple answer, Lisa Lucas, head of the National Book Foundation, recommends one way to understand the other side: read. Lucas has an almost unbounded belief in the power of reading. She took over the reins of the influential foundation last March you can hear more about that in the audio story above.
This will be the first time Lucas presides over the annual event, which is all about celebrating great writers and great books. Lucas is an avid social media user, but she doesn't believe Twitter will ever replace books — they're just too different. You don't scroll through a book quickly while waiting in line for a latte. When you read a book, you enter another world, and you have to spend time in that world. Reading a book, Lucas says, is a "protracted engagement" with people who are different from you personally, culturally and — perhaps most important at this moment — politically.
And Lucas wishes the people Hochschild interviewed for her book would read last year's nonfiction winner, Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates, about what it means to be black in America. She says a book is a great connector, so the next time you're looking for something to read, "don't just read the thing that you think is for you WJCT WJCT Anthology. Share Tweet Email.The differences between these philosophies is fundamental.
There is no significant middle ground. For the most part I will be discussing philosophical ideas rather than specific policies. The nature of policy differences is best understood in light of the underlying philosophy. Conservative philosophy is the philosophy of the U. Constitution, limited government, individual liberty, checks and balances, etc. It is easy to find out about because the authors of the Constitution wrote extensively about it, most notably in the Federalist Papers which were published prior to the national vote on the adoption of the Constitution.
It was based on three separate but compatible concepts.
Enlightenment philosophy emphasized the concept of individual equality under the law as opposed to hereditary privilege. These philosophies provided the basis for establishing the scope and limitations of government power.
The third concept was the structure of the government. It was developed by the founders, primarily James Madison. It was influenced by the study of various historical and contemporary governments, including Greek and Roman experiments with democratic forms as well as the various colonial governments.Learn More About Read Theory
Particular interest was placed on the responsiveness of the governments to the needs of the people, the degree of personal freedom, resistance to tyrannical power grabs, and long term durability. Progressivism is an amalgamation of ideas derived from various philosophers and economists from the mid s up through the s.
In many ways it is still in flux because it was never codified in a document comparable to the Constitution. Some aspects of it are well established though and we will examine them. The philosophy of the Counter-Enlightenment was a rejection of reason as a source of ultimate knowledge. It promoted retaining strong monarchical governments deriving their legitimacy from the church. In the mid s Karl Marx published works providing a new analysis of economics with a strong emphasis on the ill effects of the Industrial Revolution.
He also proposed a way of fixing the problems and achieving a harmonious and productive society. By the late s his works were well known and he had many followers. The religious influence of the early s diminished.
It seemed that humanity might finally be on the threshold of a more harmonious and just society through socialism. The impact was strongest in Europe, but it got a lot of attention in the U. Popular novelists promoted it, as did the theater and eventually movies.